The Code of Ethics and Manuscript and Archival Conservation
The initial an element of the Code of Ethics that I wish to deal with is the solitary standard (component One, II.C.). It states that, aside from value, "the best & most exacting standard of therapy" be reproduced to things and therefore, a little further on, with "large categories of things . . . procedures should always be in keeping with the conservator's respect when it comes to integrity for the things." This applies particularly to archival and manuscript preservation. Well, the Library of Congress has its own classes of what to be addressed. A number of the products are of extremely high intrinsic value or of big value towards the collections and can include such materials as art written down, manuscripts, maps, or music product which in lots of ways squeeze into the classic art in writing, highest integrity therapy category. As well as the remedies during the Library of Congress, the standard remedies, are perhaps perhaps perhaps not inconsistent by what one might generally think it's possible to conduct on an item. One point that i wish to talk about, however, that does occur in archives and libraries, is the fact that there are various other forms of materials, large sets of manuscript materials, which is why this standard just isn't especially relevant. And the ones are library and archival materials whose value resides within the information, the evidential nature, or the general construction of things into the collection, and where there could be no, or almost no value that resides in almost any specific item within the collection. An illustration could be the documents of Margaret Mead, where it really is the installation of items which is associated with the value for scientists, but where any specific product could have simply no value, or little value.